The question of whether comics and graphic novels within the
primary literacy curriculum undermine the values of the classroom, or do they
offer opportunities for learning will be deliberated in this blog post.
Having not seized the opportunity to see comics and graphic
novels being used within the primary classroom relevant readings will be drawn
upon in this blog post. The first point which Millard and Marsh (2001) makes is
that there are concerns based on the deficit model whereby those who choose to
read books in graphic forms are seen as denying themselves, just as children
who eat beef burgers and chips are imagined en masse as rejecting green
vegetables and citrus fruit. This point is unfair and does not acknowledge the
way in which comics could be good for learning in the primary classroom.
Conversely, Stafford (2009) examines the values which comics bring to education
and states that discussions with children transmits their ideas that comic
books are credible literature and are to be treated seriously as any other text
in the classroom. The fact that the word ‘credible’ has been used here scrutinises
the way in which comics offer opportunities for learning.
Another point in which comics can be seen an undermining the
values of the classroom in which was spoken about in this weeks seminar, Stafford
(2009) explains that issues need to be considered when choosing a comic book
for children as the content must be suitable as in some places comic books do
depict acts of violence. As seen from the comics and graphic novels in the
seminar some are explicit to violence and perhaps do give out a message of
violence, but perhaps children see this in a humorous way and don’t actually
think anything of this. In contrast Graham (2011) simply elucidates that children
enjoy reading comics, so it makes perfect sense to use such a resource to
enhance learning. Wright (1979) simply states that as reading teachers we must
recognize the fact that comics appeal to large numbers of children and that such
an appeal is normal, which is a huge point in which comic’s and graphic novels
offers opportunities or learning. Not only do these bring opportunities to
learning in reading, but as discussed in the seminar there is a huge prospect with
using comics and graphic novels in any subject (cross curricula) especially
PSHE.
In conclusion, by looking at relevant readings and having a discussion
in the seminar, using appropriate comics
and graphic novels within the primary classroom do offer opportunities for
learning. However, as teachers we need
to be aware of some content within these. Wright (1979) clarifies my point by
stating that ‘classroom teachers should not forget comic books, children's
interest in them has not dissipated during the last half century, if anything
it has increased. It is in the reading teacher's best interest to learn more
about this medium and to use it in motivating students and helping them to read’.
Graham, S.
(2011). Comics in the Classroom: Something To Be Taken Seriously. Language
Education in Asia. 2 (1), pp92 - 102.
Millard, E and Marsh,
J. (2001) 'Sending Minnie the Minx Home: comics and reading choices'
Cambridge Journal of Education, 31:1, pp25 – 38
Stafford, T.
(2009) ‘Teaching Comics’ in Duncan, D. (2009) Teaching Children’s Literature:
Making stories work in the classroom Abingdon: Routledge
Wright, G.
(1979). The Comic Book: A Forgotten Medium in the Classroom. The Reading Teacher.
33 (2), pp. 158-161.
I agree with your point about comics not being like beefburgers, although I think it is more to do with how they are used as to why they are seen this way. Perhaps we need to look at how we use them more to then be able to understand the complexities of them.
ReplyDelete