Friday, 21 February 2014

Week 6: Ephrem Uwalaka

 
Blog 6             Ephrem Uwalaka


Why should teachers care about digital literacy and childhood in the digital age? 


This blog will discuss aspects of “Sexualisation of Young People Review”, a Home Office paper on the impact of sexualisation of young people.


Botti (2014) reporting on research by Pew Research Centre, found in their surveys that in adult relationships text can mean trust; although most adults use social media profiles it found benefits of texting such as logistics. Texting is sometimes a lazy option, hence, a good medium for communications. The research said Racy text sext- sexting numbers are on the up, because they are easier and easier to send. People said they felt closer from receiving a text (Botti, 2014). This relational aspect appears on the surface as acceptable and romantic but the other end of the scale the BBC (27th January 2014) often report on cases such as: MP moots smartphone ban for teen 'sexting' bullies-‘Sarah Wollaston said some teenagers were illegally sharing sexual images of other teenagers without their consent, which was "bullying and harassment" But she added: "I'm not in favour of criminalising children. “Instead, such cases should be dealt with swiftly out of court, she argued’. The thought of such depravity of perpetrators and imagined suffering of victims is often preferred to be ignored or forgotten about as if it does not go on, but as teachers we are pivotal in tackling such issues and defending moral ground just as the BBC (27th January 2014) report pointed out:’


      "It's also critical to educate young people about the risks of sending intimate photographs. The Child Exploitation Online Protection Centre has developed a specific educational resource to tackle sexting, which is designed for use by teachers’.


Burns (5th February 2014) highlights in her report the dangers young children are facing, from the NSPCC they say ‘We are facing an e-safety time bomb’ and the internet and mobile phones are in children’s everyday lives offering huge benefits but massive dangers. Children need to be taught how to differentiate the dichotomy and a body of people are calling for teaching to be started at 5 year olds. They are calling for e-safety lesson not just for children, but parents/carers also.


Dr Papadopoulos is a well-known psychologists held in the highest regard in the UK. She is often approached by the press and authority for her professional knowledge. In a publication review on sexualisation of young people which Papadopoulos conducted, the facts that sexualisation is a multi-factorial issue, emotional, and thwart with opinions and conjectures, a scientific objective approach was taken. Thus:


 


‘Behind the social commentary and the headlines about inappropriate clothing and games for children, there are the real statistics, on teenage partner violence, sexual bullying and abuse that need to be acknowledged and addressed’ (Papadopoulos, 2010:3).


Dr Papadopoulos (2010:4) stated, children have a natural sexual curiosity so we should acknowledge this and provide a safe, supportive and informative presentation of ‘gender and sexuality’ for them to grow a healthy, sexual and emotional understanding.


Sexual images are prevalent in today’s society but the message behind these images are stark reality of expectations, morals and acceptability, the effect has filtered lower and lower to young children and worse, their attitudes and regard for their peers (Papadopoulos, 2010). There exists a polarity between acceptable adult behaviour and unacceptable abusive behaviour by young people. This dichotomy is heightened by many causes but social media is the most accessible where abuse and inappropriate activity is most likely to happen on a regular basis with very little control by responsible adults or care givers (Papadopoulos, 2010).


‘Schools can help children develop the capacity to interpret and filter information and to recognise and value diversity. As such perhaps we need to consider the value of media literacy and gender studies and begin to see them as core to the curriculum we teach our children’(Papadopoulos, 2010:10)


This is a very brief look at a massive problem in emerging technology and our community. To answer the question of why as teachers, should we care about digital literacy and childhood in the digital age?  We are as teachers on the front line; we have a professional, moral, legal duty to act in the best way possible in protecting young children by fully applying e-safety and following the strict code of conduct and policies for computer use in whichever school we work in and in our own private lives. 


 


Bibliography


BBC News  (27th January 2014)  ‘sexting’ bullies [online] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25917314   (Accessed on: 17/02/2014)


Botti, D. (11th february 2014) Sexting BBC News [online]  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26124982  (Accessed on: 19/02/2014)


Burns, L. (5th February 2014) Internet safety lessons urged for 5 year olds. BBC News. [online] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-21328411  (Accessed on: 19/02/2014)


Papadopoulos, L. (2010) Sexualisation of Young People Review Home Office (Executive Summary – link on LN) http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100418065544/http://homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/Sexualisation-young-people2835.pdf?view=Binary   (Accessed on: 20/02/2014)

5 comments:

  1. I agree that harmful and inapropriate material is very available to children, however, as a teacher I feel our responsibility lies with educating children to the dangers of the internet, so that they are aware of the vast scale of the internet. Another point I would like to raise is that as teachers we have little control over what happens at home; all we can do is try to guide and nurture children, so that they recognise what is wrong and right, and are equipped to make their own judgements of the world.

    Lastly, I do not see children having mobile phones as a negative at all. If their parents are happier knowing that their children are safe, and can contact them at any time, then that is up to them. The 'dangers' you discuss with children having mobile phones I feel are much smaller than the dangers of having free access to a computer. simply because a mobile phone number is specific and hard to get hold of, whereas an IP address or email address is commonly available to the public. However I do recognise the potential for danger.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This blog post is very interesting, but I’m not sure whether everything on here relates to primary school aged children. Indeed you mention its ‘it's critical to educate young people about the risks of sending intimate photographs’, I’m not sure if this would ever come up in primary school and don’t see why it should, leaving it to secondary school aged children.

    I agree with your point on ‘we are facing an e-safety time bomb’ and the internet and mobile phones are in children’s everyday lives offering huge benefits but massive dangers’. I have only come across children no younger than 9 in having a mobile phone, which in this case the talk with upper key stage 2 children, would be prominent.

    From the article I read, Marsh (et al) Digital beginnings they spoke about greatly those parents were found to generally be very positive about the role of media in their young children’s social, emotional, linguistic and cognitive development. I think from reading this article and seeing the interaction that parents have on technology, it is the duty more of the parents rather than the teacher to educate their children on internet safety. I’m not saying teachers shouldn’t touch on it at primary school level, as I agree with your point that we as teacher we do have a professional, moral, legal duty to act in the best way possible in protecting young children by fully applying e- safety, but parents have this involvement as well.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I take note of your comments. Firstly, the text is not against mobile phone use but to point out that the massification of mobile technology within the younger generation (which does include primary school age children) has removed vertually all control of content of what can be uploaded or downloaded by the user.
    Secondly, with regards to our obligation, the government and other organisations such as Teacher unions have documented about the growing need for teachers to be more pro active and not just think care givers will be enough.
    Lastly, I will upload the ATL article I refere to.

    ReplyDelete
  4. In February's 2014 ATL magazine there is an article on 'sex education lottery' (page 7) and 'pornography lessons' (page 4) which I highlighted and discussed as current issues being aired about the sexualisation issues and as ATL nicely put it 'Saving Childhood'.
    Please go to this link: http://www.atl.org.uk/Images/report.2014.02.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree that there needs to be caution over the use of mobile phones, however I was just pointing out the benefits of modern technology, as it is not always something that needs to be feared, or made a negative. It is amazing what new technology can do, and used in the right way (as demonstrated in our seminars for this module) can be extremely enriching and educational for children. Of course there are downsides, and great caution needs to be taken, but is this not the same case for anything new or slightly risky that is introduced to children?

    ReplyDelete