Blog 3
Ephrem Uwalaka
Does
the use of comics and graphic novels (hard copy/electronic versions) within the
primary literacy curriculum undermine the values of the classroom or do they
offer opportunities for learning?
The argument about the value of comics for the
benefit of children’s’ literacy has been fought over many decades and still is in
question (Marsh and Millard, 2001). As a trainee teacher, as a reader and once
a child my position in this debate is as follows.
In today’s
two seminars my peers and I examined and made comics. We also evaluated and
discussed a wide variety of different comics from a range intended for a
diverse readership of differing ages, gender, interests etc. The former seminar
was fun, interesting, creative, engaging… The latter seminar was more in-depth
about the deeper impact reading comics has on a reader and the pros and cons of
this type of genre and why the argument still reins.
For one moment, let us consider what Marsh and
Millard (2001) wrote about how bad comics are and their subsequent inquiry.
They are over sexualised, intensely violent, and poor in grammar, weak in depth
of meaning through text and a real threat to children’s development of
traditional literature. Furthermore, the most damning views called for a ban,
blaming medical conditions were caused by this (comics) type of popular
culture. Marsh and Millard (2001) conducted a small scale research project and
their findings were contrasting. They found that comics had many benefits such
as similar amount of unknown words within the text and the comics acted as a
bridge to further literacy in the form of scaffolding. Some of the distained
comments earlier mentioned were addressed. Regarding comics in schools,
teachers need to scrutinize any material sent home but the benefits as an
interlude and as another form of other text,
as mentioned in the National Curriculum (DfE, 2013), is valid. Overall, many
positives were found. Numerous mixed
perceptions from teachers and pupils alike were heard and Marsh and Millard’s
(2001) conclusion was not conclusive but they confirmed there are valuable
benefits found within comics. Ultimately they established that popular culture
does have a place somewhere in-between school and home.
Now I am going to discuss the first seminar. In the
last paragraph, Marsh and Millard (2001) discussed comics in school and home;
it related more to the latter seminar mentioned earlier. Here, we designed and
created our own individual comic strip (see uploaded snapshot on blog). This
exercise was motivating, fun, interesting engaging and holistically beneficial
to my teaching practice in so many ways. Popular opinion would find it hard to
refute or dismiss as un-educational. The
Book Trust (2014) support comics as an educational avenue, and sits firmly
within their rich range of literature. Comic life is an online programme where
children can create their own comic in a secure classroom setting. Abbotswood Junior
School use comic making in lessons and they report that this puts the comics in
the hands of the children; it engages them with the opportunity of creativity,
individualism, inclusivity, writing, literacy narrative and ultimately an
interesting genre as described in the Marsh and Millard (2001) research. In our
seminar the evidence to support comics as a constructive means toward literacy
demonstrated the full potential and as such, I will advocate their use within
my pedagogical spectrum.
Bibliography
Abbotswood Junior School. Comic Life planning. [online] http://www.abbotswood.hants.sch.uk/planning/comiclife.html
(Accessed on: 31/01/2014)
Book Trust (2014) Inspiring a Love of Books [online] http://www.booktrust.org.uk/about-us/research/
(Accessed on: 31/01/2014)
Comic Life [online] http://comic-life.en.softonic.com/
(Accessed on: 31/01/2014)
DoE, (September 2013) English Programmes of Study:
key stages 1 and 2 National curriculum in England [online on] https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/260491/PRIMARY_national_curriculum_-_English_RS2.pdf
(Accessed: 02/02/2014)
Marsh, E. and Millard, J. (2001) Sending Minni the
Minx Home. Cambridge Journal of education.
Volume 31, No.1, pp 25-38
No comments:
Post a Comment