Reflect on the implications of this session for your
future practice on relevant sources
In creating the multimodal text, there were many
possibilities for its use within the classroom, not only in explicitly teaching
children how to use and create multimodal texts but also to support all areas
of the curriculum (Poole, 2001). As suggested by Medwell, Moore, Wray and
Griffiths (2012) although electronic texts share features that are key to
printed texts they also have distinct features which make new demands on the
readers and writers. Therefore the first implication for my practice is to develop
my knowledge of electronic texts as well as printed.
Another factor is that multimodal texts are
increasingly becoming more embedded in children’s current popular culture such
as through film, computers, ipad and eBooks (Lambirth, 2003). With this in mind
it is becoming more apparent that children need to be able to read, communicate
and represent knowledge through multimodal texts to be literate and function
efficiently in a digital work (Futurelab, 2010).
A further point of multimodal texts is that they can
support and enrich other areas of the curriculum (Futurelab, 2010). In literacy
teachers can create a multimodal text to support reading during guided or
shared reading or children can create their own as part of a writing project.
This would require them to think about audience, purpose, visual, textual and
structural elements (DfE, 2013). For ICT multimodal texts require children to
be able to use ICT and develop digital literacy skills to be able to understand
them and use them (Futurelab, 2010).
In conclusion, the implications for my practice
include developing my knowledge and understanding of multimodal texts so that I
am able to use and teach children how to use them efficiently (Medwell et al.
2012). The second is to plan for their use in classroom activities whether for
whole-class or small group activities.
Bibliography
DfE (2013) The national curriculum in England Framework
document Nottingham: DfE accessed from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/260388/MASTER_final_national_curriculum_11_9_13_2.pdf
Futurelab (2010) Digital literacy across the curriculum a Futurelab handbook Bristol:
Futurelab
Lambirth, A. (2003) ‘”They get enough of that at home”: Understanding
aversion to popular cultures in schools’ Reading 37(1) pp.9-13
Medwell J. Moore G. Wray D. and Griffiths V. (2012) ’14
Electronic texts’ from Primary English
Knowledge and Understanding London: Learning Matters Ltd.
Poole P. (2001) Primary
ICT Handbook English Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes Ltd.
Lambirth (2003) discussed popular culture, about teacher’s reluctance to use this type of text. The attitude of teachers that drove him to research in schools (a formal environment) bought to mind your attitude. This is the type of attitude that Lambirth (2003) wanted to see, a varied multi-dimensional approach to literacy.
ReplyDeleteLambirtth, A. (2003) “They Get Enough of that At Home”: understanding popular culture in schools. Reading Literacies and Language. pp9-13.