This blog reflects on
the challenge to produce a talking book on Children’s Rights.
Prior to working with
the children, our group planned the project through group messaging on
Facebook. We discussed elements such as learning objectives, resources, apps and
outcomes etc. This planning was
invaluable to a successful outcome, just as Franklin
and Stringer (2010) state about the important stages because creative processes
in collaborative work for children rely on planning and evaluation.
The children were shy
at first, but once we had introduced ourselves and explained our purpose and the
project, the children became responsive. On reflection, it would have been
easier to have known the children’s capabilities and their personalities
beforehand in order to pitch our level of teaching and engagement to the
individual learner. Our aim was to incorporate media
literacy in to the curriculum by creating an iBook using Book Creator. The
children did successfully create an iBook. The children took to the exercise
well and behaviour was very good, except on one occasion, in the nurture room
where we had gone to in order to use a quiet area as envisaged by (Franklin and
Stringer, 2010). During our transition from the T.V. to the floor, two girls
were distracted by a dolls house which was next to them. I was just about to
intervene and bring them back on task when, another teacher stepped in and did
what I was about to do. In a normal situation, preparing the teaching
environment in advance, distractions such as a dolls house could be removed.
On reflection, it was only for a brief moment and considering the attention
span of Year One children, it is expected.
Our first learning objective
was, by the end of the session, children could in ‘child speak’, tell us ‘Article
15 on Freedom of Association: Children
have the right to meet together and to join groups and organisations, as long
as this does not stop other people from enjoying their rights’ (Unicef). One child kept on referring to article 15 as
the right to join a gang; I saw this as his limited connection of prior knowledge
and him making inference in order to make that connection. A gang can be an
innocent friendly group (such as the Famous Five or My Gang by Brian Moses etc.),
only modern reference and media gives it the bad image.
The second learning
objective was, to understand what animation was and to explain the process. The
children found it hard to make connection between pictures and animation.
Children will have their own ‘preconceived ideas about what animation is from
what they have seen at the cinema and watched on television’ (wikispaces, 2014).
Animation is the process by which we see still pictures move. Each picture is
shot on film one at a time and is shown consecutively, making the pictures
appear to move. We had thought about showing flick books (Warner, 2014) as
an example of simple animation but time was critical. At
the end of the session they were able to describe what animation was.
The third learning
objective was, to learn some capacity in using iPads. One function was the drag
and drop to delete a picture while in ‘I can animate’ app. I demonstrated the
process and then the children copied.
‘One thing that is now widely accepted is that
blending animated images with narration rather than text is more effective’
(Manroop, 2008). The children included in their iBook, interviews on their
understanding of article 15, this exercise involved speaking and listening
which is a curriculum requirement. ‘Ainsworth, S. (2008) suggests that there
are six levels to understanding learning through animation: expressive;
cognitive, motor and perceptual; affective and motivational; strategic;
metacognitive; and rhetorical’ (Cited in Manroop, 2014).
Other Challenges
that I and my peers found were, letting go, giving ownership, letting children
make their mistakes. I found adding captions to iMovie hard and I had to seek
help. Holding the iPad still, while moving pieces was difficult for the
children and I had to hold the camera while they pressed the camera button. In
a future lesson I would consider using the iPad mini for this age group and
also add a challenge for them to solve the problem of keeping the camera
stationary. One change I would have liked would be to have six children instead
of five, because I found the numbers were not balanced.
Teaching
children digital literacy and capacity is, from my work experience, essential.
Therefore, in a future lesson I would set aside more time to fully cover
techniques, skills and processes, and knowledge to understand the outcome to
achieve the objectives that reach the purpose for the intended audience
(Franklin and Stringer, 2010).
Bibliography
City and County of Swansea Rights
Respecting Schools Award (2014) https://swansea-edunet.gov.uk/en/schools/gwyrosydd/Pages/Rights_Respecting_Schools_Award_.aspx
(Accessed on: 21/03/2014)
Clioflics (2014) One Teachers Story http://www.cleo.net.uk/resources/displayframe.php?src=321/consultants_resources%2Fteknical%2Fflashideas%2FButtonTemplate2.html
(Accessed on: 20/03/2014)
Franklin, J. and
Stringer, O. (2010) I Can Animate Teacher’s
Book [online] http://teachnet.eu/cmacaulay/files/ICA_Teachers_Book.pdf (Accessed on: 21/03/2014)
Manroop, (2014) http://www.qudos-animations.co.uk/blog/how-can-animation-facilitate-learning/
(Accessed on: 20/03/2014)
Warner, M. (2014)
Animation Ideas http://www.teachingideas.co.uk/ict/animationideas.htm
(Accessed on: 20/03/2014)
Wikispaces (2014) https://internet-safety-primary-education.wikispaces.com/animation
(Accessed on: 20/03/2014)
I agree with your comment on 'knowing the children’s capabilities and their personalities beforehand in order to pitch our level of teaching and engagement to the individual learner', I think this would have helped my group more to create a talking book to incorporate the children more.
ReplyDelete